Recent government guidance recommends that people with dementia are encouraged to express their views and be included in decisions about their care.This study from the Joseph Rowntree Foundation reveals how Talking Mats, a low-tech communication tool, can help both parties participate fully in discussions about everyday care:

• Family carers reported that Talking Mats made them feel 'listened to' by the person with dementia. They also felt that their relative could actually 'see' their point of view when using Talking Mats.
• Talking Mats can help people negotiate over day-to-day decisions.
• The mats also offer a way for recording joint views to inform later decisions made with members of the wider support community.

The full report is available here

Summary:

The researchers Joan Murphy, Tracey M. Oliver and Sylvia Cox outlined the following key points

• Talking Mats can help both people with dementia and their family carers feel more involved in discussions about managing their daily lives.
• People with dementia reported that Talking Mats helped them to clarify their thoughts, express them to their family carers, and reach a decision in these discussions.
• Family carers reported that Talking Mats made them feel ‘listened to’ by the person with dementia. They also felt that their relative could actually ‘see’ their point of view when using Talking Mats.
• Talking Mats can contribute to the process of negotiation in day-to-day decision-making. They also offer a method for recording joint views to inform later decisions made with members of the wider support community.
• These findings contribute in a practical way to the current debate on how to meaningfully involve people with dementia and family carers in decisions about care. They are also relevant to the assessment of needs.
• The findings have implications for the organisation, delivery, regulation and improvement of services for people with dementia, as their views and those of their family carers can be recorded to clarify and enhance planning. This is essential if personalised services, and user and carer directed outcomes, are to be achieved.

Practical implications

The project findings contribute in a practical way to the current debate on how to meaningfully involve people with dementia in decisions about their care. Talking Mats demonstrates an innovative and positive approach to helping carers and people with dementia discuss the management of everyday activities. For both, 'living well with dementia' involves a complex balancing act between negotiating changing needs and preferences in everyday life, and making choices about current and future support.

Talking Mats provides a framework whereby the needs and views of the person with dementia and their family carer can be articulated and shared. By facilitating such conversations, it may be possible to identify strengths and abilities, correct misperceptions about abilities and preferences, reduce anxiety on the part of both the person with dementia and their family carer, and help them express their concerns in a safe, non-confrontational way.

This study demonstrates that Talking Mats could enable people with dementia and their family carers to jointly discuss and make decisions about daily activities – an important discovery for health, care and other staff (such as Housing and Benefit Agency staff) who assess needs and provide care and support. Staff working within these sectors must be able to not only identify the specific needs and preferences of people with dementia, but also take into account the views of family members and work with them. Talking Mats can not only contribute to the process of negotiation in day-to-day decision-making, but also offer a method for recording views to inform later decisions made with members of the wider support community.

Policy relevance

The findings presented here have implications for the organisation, delivery, regulation and improvement of services for people with dementia. Recent guidance, from both the Department of Health and devolved governments, recommends that people with dementia should be involved in decisions about care options and key life transitions.

Government policy also advocates that users and carers should influence how government strategies and targets are implemented. The findings from this study suggest that Talking Mats can support people with dementia and their carers in expressing their views about services, and could therefore be a significant help to those implementing policy and seeking to change practice.

Table 2 (see PDF) highlights some of the recommendations and guidelines described in government documents and relevant to the Talking Mats framework.

Conclusions

This project has shown that people with dementia and family carers can use Talking Mats together to feel more involved in making decisions about managing daily life.

This in turn could lead to increased well-being and positive adjustment to accepting increasing levels of care. Perhaps most importantly, Talking Mats has the potential to help improve the relationship between the person with dementia and family carers, if all involved feel that their views have been acknowledged.

The next step must be to put this knowledge into practice. If, as policy-makers suggest, the focus is now to truly engage people with dementia and their families in decisions about their care, it is clear that Talking Mats offer an innovative means of allowing the views of people with dementia and their family carers to be heard.

About the project

The project ran over a 21-month period from April 2008 to December 2009. It was carried out by Joan Murphy and Tracey Oliver at the Talking Mats Research and Development Centre, University of Stirling.

Eighteen couples (person with dementia and a family carer) were asked to discuss how the person with dementia was managing four aspects of daily living:

• personal care (washing, dressing);
• getting around (walking, using the stairs);
• housework (cooking, making the bed); and
• activities (watching TV, listening to music).

Couples talked about these topics using both Talking Mats and usual communication methods (verbal discussion) to discuss whether they were 'managing', 'needed assistance' or 'not managing' in each area. Afterwards, the couples were asked to complete a short questionnaire to determine how involved they felt in each type of discussion.