Half a million older people at risk if the budget hits social care‚ warns charity
Half a million frail older people in England will be left without state-supported care services if older people’s care is not protected from government-wide spending cuts in tomorrow’s Budget‚ according to new research for Age Concern and Help the Aged.1
The new research‚ undertaken by the London School of Economics (LSE) and the University of Kent‚ reveals that a funding gap of £1.75 billion could open up within just two years2. Ahead of the Budget‚ the charity is calling on the Chancellor to urgently address the short-term financial threat to the care system by guaranteeing that spending on care will not be cut from next April.
The charity is proposing that money ring-fenced for the NHS should be shared with older people’s social care services. Reducing the NHS budget by just 0.2% annually for the next five years would bolster local social care budgets by £1 billion‚ according to the charity. And even a real-terms increase for older people’s care to meet rising demand could be paid for by an annual cut in NHS spending of 0.6% 3.
The LSE and University of Kent research modelled the impact on older people’s care services of expected government-wide spending cuts as predicted by the Institute of Fiscal Studies (6.7% per year in the two years from April 2011)4. It projects that around 300‚000 of the 490‚000 people losing entitlement to state-funded care would be able to pay for some help privately‚ but around 180‚000 people with care needs would go without any support at all 5 – an increase of 23% from today. These cuts would mainly hit people living in their own homes‚ not the highest need people supported in care homes‚ with councils able to help less than half as many people living at home as they would if today’s eligibility criteria were maintained.
Commenting ahead of the Budget‚ Age Concern and Help the Aged’s Charity Director‚ Michelle Mitchell‚ said:
“Our care system was in crisis long before the recession and any spending cuts could be catastrophic. If these cuts go ahead‚ half a million people will be left without state support and the lives of many thousands of frail‚ vulnerable people will be put at risk.
“We recognise the need for spending constraint in this Budget‚ but the axe must not fall on the services that older people rely on most. Transferring resources from the NHS to older people’s care would be a tough decision to make‚ but one that could ultimately save money as well as the lives of many older people.
“Despite the recent focus on social care‚ we are still waiting for the political parties to set out credible proposals for comprehensive reform of the system. We urge them all to set out their plans in full ahead of the election in order to give voters a clear choice. In the meantime it is absolutely vital that the government uses this Budget to safeguard the immediate future of care.”
Similar entries
- Age Concern and Help the Aged's response to the Conservatives' pensioner pledge
- Age Concern and Help the Aged comment on the Government's Green Homes‚ Warmer Homes home energy strategy
- A sweet and sour budget for older people
- Eight out of ten frail older people surveyed rely on outside help for support at home
- Age Concern and Help the Aged comment on the King’s Fund review of social care
- Age Concern and Help the Aged respond to the Care Quality Commission's annual performance assessment review 2008/9
- Age Concern and Help the Aged comment on state pension uprating
- Age Concern responds to today's interest rate cut
- Six out of ten think politicians are not doing enough to improve care for older people
- Age Concern and Help the Aged's response to the Community and Local Governement's (CLG's) Place Survey



